English Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Which Losses Sustained by Reinsurers Arising Out of World Trade Centre Attacks Were Caused by Two Separate Events

Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance Company Ltd v. Heraldglen Limited and Others [2013] EWHC 154 (Comm)

This case is an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (appeal on a point of law) of an arbitral award dated January 26, 2012 concerning the aggregation of losses sustained by original reinsurers (the respondents in this case) arising out of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC).

The appellant provided retrocession excess of loss reinsurances to the respondents, who, in turn, subscribed …

Continue Reading

NYS DFS Announces Sandy Mediation Program – New Requirements for Insurers

15th Amendment to Regulation 64, 11 NYCRR 216

The New York State Department of Financial Services has enacted an emergency amendment to Insurance Regulation 64, effective February 25, 2013, targeting claims resulting from Hurricane Sandy. The amendment applies to any claim for loss or damage, other than claims made under flood policies issued under the national flood insurance program, that occurred from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012, in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, or Westchester. …

Continue Reading

Cases for Professional Liability Monthly – February 2013 Edition

Cases provided courtesy of LexisNexis.

CAMICO MUT. INS. v. HEFFLER, RADETICH & SAITTA

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ALTERNATIVE FOR RISK TRANSFER v. ARIO

FINCH v. TOOHER, WOCL, LYDON, LLC

LODATO v. SILVESTRO

MILLENNIUM IMPORT, LLC v. REED SMITH LLP, ET AL

RETAIL VENTURES, INC., et al v NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE

UNION DE EMPLEADOS DE MUELLES DE PUERTO RICO PRSSA WELFARE PLAN v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. OF PUERTO RICO

 

 …

Continue Reading

Claim for Improperly Sterilized Medical Equipment Limited to Policy Limits for One Occurrence

Mitsui Sumitomo Ins. Co. ofAmericav. Duke University Health Sys. No. 11-2057, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. February 11, 2013
The Fourth Circuit held that Duke University Health System was limited to policy limits for one occurrence when a mishap occurred where surgical instruments were sterilized with elevator hydraulic fluid. The facts of the case involve elevator workers placing hydraulic fluid into buckets distributed to them by Duke University, which had originally stored surgical detergents. Duke employees then used the hydraulic fluid …

Continue Reading

Insurer’s Reliance on (Overturned) Ruling in DJ Action Insulates against Further Claims of Breach of Contract

Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seagate Tech. Inc.
U.S.Dist. Ct.,N.D.Cal.

A California federal judge recently held that an insurer did not breach its contract when it stopped defending a policyholder based on a trial court declaratory judgment ruling that was later overturned.

The court explained that in the ordinary case, the duty to defend terminates upon a judicial determination that the insured does not have a potentially-covered claim. The decision granting summary judgment became such a judicial determination when judgment was …

Continue Reading

Number of Occurrences Limited to Just One in Pennsylvania Defective Drywall Litigation

Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Devon International, Inc. et al. (E.D.Pa) (Index No. 2:11-cv-05930-GP)

A federal court in Pennsylvania limited the number of occurrences under a CGL policy for injuries caused by defective drywall. The case involved a sourcing agent for Chinese products who filled an order for drywall by purchasing them from a Chinese drywall manufacturer and shipping them to Florida. The drywall contained an improper amount of sulfur damaging real and personal property.

Although there were two separate consecutive policies at issue, the insurer …

Continue Reading

CT Judge Says Insurer’s New Claims Against Reinsurer Are Plausible

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Excalibu R Reinsurance Corp. (D.Conn.Feb. 1, 2013)

On February 1, 2013, a federal judge in Connecticut granted an insurer’s motion to amend its complaint against a reinsurer to include claims based on information revealed during discovery. In the case, the reinsurer refused to pay to the insurer amounts the insurer claims it is owed under a treaty of reinsurance and the insurer sued the reinsurer to recover them. After discovery was already underway, the insurer moved to amend its complaint.

The …

Continue Reading

Cases for the February 2013 Edition of CaseWatch: Insurance

Cases provided courtesy of LexisNexis.

Alco Iron & Metal Co. v. Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co.

Aquarius Well Drilling, Inc., v. American States Ins. Co.

Brink v. XE Holding

Colony Ins. Co. v. Kwasnik, Kanowitz & Associates, P.C.

Companion Prop. And Cas. Ins. Co. v. Moreno

Dupree v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Dean v. N.Y. Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Everest Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Evanston Ins. Co.,

Fisher v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.

Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoefer

Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius

Ill.

Continue Reading