Professional Liability Monthly October Edition is Now Available

The publication is distributed monthly. Cases are organized by topic, and where available, hyperlinks are included providing recipients with direct access to the full decision. In addition, we provide the latest information regarding news in the professional liability industry. We appreciate your interest in our publication, and welcome your feedback. We also encourage you to share the publication with your colleagues. If others in your organization are interested in receiving the publication or if you would like to be removed from the distribution list, please …

Continue Reading

Cases Cited In Professional Liability Monthly – October 15, 2009

Download Medical Mut. v. Indian Harbor

Download HSB Group v. SVB Underwriting

Download Harker v. Federal Ins.

Download Southwest Georgia v. Colonial

Download Fulton Bellows v. Federal

Download Landmark v. Reli Title

Download Nations First v. Tudor Ins.

Download Genzyme Corp v. Federal

Download Auto-Owners Ins. v. Lloyd's

Download Gambino v. American Guarantee

Download Weddington v. United National

Download Warren Hosp. v. American Cas.

Download Chicago Ins. Capwill

Download Nationwide v. Garzone

Download Swedish American v. Sari Ins.

Download Tone Order

Download Stanford Order- Defense

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Remands $34 Million Jury Verdict Against Reinsurer Back to Lower Court to Address Which Claims Should Be Arbitrated

AXA Versicherung AG v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.

(2nd Cir. [NY] October 14, 2009)

 

An action was filed against a reinsurer relating to two reinsurance contracts.  The plaintiff alleged that the reinsurer misrepresented or failed to disclose certain material facts in connection with the negotiation of these contracts and sued for intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, material nondisclosure, and breach of the duty of utmost good faith.  After an arbitration proceeding was stayed, the matter was tried before a jury in the

Continue Reading

First Circuit Concludes That A Standard D&O Policy Is Triggered Only When Director or Officer is Named as Defendant

Medical Mutual Insurance Company of Maine v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company

(1 Cir. (Me.), October 8, 2009)

 

 

The CEO of the policyholder suffered a stroke, and shortly thereafter was ousted from his position.  As a result, he filed complaints with the EEOC and his state's human rights commission claiming disabilty complaints  Those resulted in "Right to Sue" letters. 

In the ensuing legal proceeding, the former CEO named only the corporation as defendant, but he did allege wrongful conduct attributable to directors and officers.   …

Continue Reading

Eleventh Circuit Affirms That Crime Insurance Policy Was A Claims-Made Policy Precluding Policyholder From Aggregating Theft Claims Occurring Over Multiple Years and Multiple Policies.

PBSJ Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co.

(United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, October 1, 2009)

 

Policyholder, PBSJ Corp., appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to insurer regarding the coverage owed under its policy for employee theft over multiple years.  Policyholder purchased an insurance policy from insurer covering criminal acts, including employee theft for each year between 1992 and 2005 in the amount of $2 million.  The policyholder sustained $42 million in losses due to employee theft during his period

Continue Reading

District Court Dismisses Insurer’s Claim that “Litigation Hold” Letter Consitutes Notice Under the Policy But Fails to Declare It Bad Faith

SNL Financial LC v. Philadelphia Insurance Co. (W.D. Vir. September 30, 2009)

Plaintiff commenced this declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking coverage of an underlying discrimination lawsuit pursuant to its employment practices liability insurance policy.  Defendant denied the claim, arguing that plaintiff made material misrepresentations when plaintiff renewed the policy.  Specifically, defendant argues that the "litigation hold" letter plaintiff received in which it was required to preserve all evidence relating to a possible discrimination lawsuit triggered its notice obligation under the policy and such information was material to …

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Remands $34M Jury Verdict Against AIG

AXA Versicherung AG v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.

(S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2009)

 

A federal judge remanded a $34 million jury verdict against AIG and its subsidiaries for fraudulent inducement involving reinsurance facilities. On appeal, AIG argued that the verdict could not stand because the plaintiff’s claims should have been arbitrated or, alternatively, that they should have been tried by the bench, not a jury. The plaintiff countered that AIG waived its right to arbitration. It also argued that a jury trial was appropriate because …

Continue Reading

CaseWatch: Insurance Cases for October 9, 2009 Issue

Download Accufleet, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Download Altimari v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada

Download American Soc’y for Tech.-Israel Inst. of Tech. v. First Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.

Download Baggett v. Automobile Association of America 

Download Black v. Long Term Disability Insurance 

Download Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana v. Montana State Auditor and Commissioner of Insurance 

Download Boggs v. Great Northern Ins. Co. 

Download Celina Ins. Group. v. Yoder & Frey, Inc. 

Download Empire

Continue Reading

Insurer Must Defend Insured In Alleged Organ-Harvesting Scheme

Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Garzone

(E.D. Penn, September 17, 2009)

 

In this declaratory judgment action, the insurer sought to have the court render a decision on whether or not it has a duty to defend and/or indemnify its policyholders, providers of crematory services, for underlying claims involving the policyholder’s selling of body parts for cash.  The underlying claims alleged that the policyholders either intentionally or by their negligence participated in a scheme to harvest organs of deceased individuals without the consent of

Continue Reading