S.J. Amoroso Construction Company, Inc. v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.
(9th Cir.(Cal.), April 30, 2009)
The underlying complaint alleged damages as a result of a third party’s misrepresentations that induced one party to contract with another. The theory of liability depended on the fact that the third party was not a party to the contract and had no liability under it. Therefore, the exclusion did not apply.
By Richard J. Cohen and Carrie P. Appler
https://www.goldbergsegalla.com/attorneys/Appler.html